Trace the failure to its source.
Understand what broke.
Review
a fix you can explain.
3Aflow turns CI noise into a diagnosis grounded in the code that actually ran.
01 / THE APPROACH
Logs tell part of the story. 3Aflow connects the failure to the source, so your next move has a reason behind it.
De-noise build output, group duplicate errors, and bring the relevant test context into focus.
A second pass checks the diagnosis against source at the failing commit. File, line, error, and entity: connected.
Get a focused suggestion with the reasoning attached. Optional draft fix PRs keep review in your team’s hands.
02 / OPEN THE CASE FILE
Follow the evidence in three example failures.
Interactive illustration · not a live analysis
FAIL selects the route with the lowest distance Expected: 10 Received: 110 at routeCalculator.test.ts:42:18 Process completed with exit code 1.
The test expects the lowest administrative distance. The comparison in findBestRoute() keeps the higher value instead.
A grounded suggestion is a starting point for review. Passing evidence checks does not prove that a fix is correct.
03 / FITS YOUR WORLD
Bring clarity to the workflow you already have, with deployment choices that fit your team.
Talk through your setup ↗
GitHub Actions · GitLab CI · Azure DevOps · Jenkins
Slack
& Microsoft Teams delivery
04 / THE COST OF AN INTERRUPTION
Put a number on the time your team spends investigating CI. Adjust the assumptions to match your workflow.
An estimate of investigation cost, not a promise of savings.
Failures × minutes ÷ 60 × hourly cost × 20 working days. Excludes CI compute and subscription costs.
05 / A PLAN FOR YOUR FLOW
Choose the scale that fits your team. We’ll walk through access, deployment, and an evaluation together.
Get to know the workflow.
For an active engineering team.
Connect teams and workflows.
A deployment built around you.
Demo-led onboarding. Confirm plan availability and deployment requirements with our team.
A FEW GOOD QUESTIONS
3Aflow checks a diagnosis against source at the failing commit: whether the referenced file and line exist, whether the error is present in the log, and whether the named code entity can be verified. These checks make the reasoning easier to inspect; they do not guarantee a correct fix.
The core workflow delivers a diagnosis and suggested fix for review. The optional auto-fix workflow opens a draft pull request. Your team reviews the change and its CI results before deciding to merge.
Self-hosted deployments and local inference with Ollama are part of the Enterprise discussion. We’ll confirm network boundaries, model configuration, and integration requirements during your evaluation.
No. It is an interactive illustration with three prepared examples. Book a walkthrough to evaluate 3Aflow against your own build and test failures.
Tell us about your CI stack using the form below. We’ll follow up to discuss your needs and arrange a walkthrough. Submitting the form requests a conversation; it does not create an account or subscription.
YOUR NEXT BUILD DESERVES BETTER
Bring your hardest CI failure.
Let’s follow the evidence
together.
Your request has been received. We’ll follow up at the email address you provided.